Hello everyone!
I am alive. Sorry I haven’t made any announcements recently. I have been extremely busy with non-web related things. I have signed up for a new server, but I haven’t transferred Vote4Cause over yet. I have spent what time I have learning a lot about running a web server and learning new programming languages that will allow me to create a more robust Vote4Cause site for everyone to enjoy. Of course, learning these things and providing application overhauls take time and I don’t have a bunch of that right now. However, I haven’t abandoned this and I do plan on making improvements soon.
I want to address 2 concerns that seem to come up a lot.
1) The colorful avatars: As most of you know, I removed these because they were creating a strain on the server. Without getting too technical, they won’t be feasible to bring back even with the new server without some moderate coding work. I need to make a system where you choose one and then save it to the database without having them generate on the fly (how I was doing it - very easy to implement but a huge resource hog). The new overhaul I am working on will allow you to upload your own image that will be used to identify you.
2) The voting times: The voting waiting times have changed significantly (as have many things) since the site started back in November. This has acutely been due to the server strain, but also is related to what this site really is about. I go back and forth and get different opinions on the matter (of course, you are all free to make a case for one way or the other). While I love that people spend more time on Vote4Cause with the shorter waiting times, that wasn’t my intention when I set it up that way. It sort of evolved into a site where you chat and vote. It is more fun that way, but it lends itself to having just a couple of runaway winners each round… the ones that have dedicated voters. In lieu of shorter voting times, the other option is to look at an extreme like voting once a day. Then the votes become really valuable and competition each round will be more even. Recruiting a friend to vote once will mean a lot, where now those votes carry little impact. Of course, the downside is that it is boring for the dedicated supporters. So where I am leaning right now is moving away from 5 minutes. Only because it seems to be too long for the dedicated bunch to have fun chatting, but too short where the votes still aren’t that close. I will likely make the voting period even longer. I know I will get a lot of flak for this, but the site is doing its job even with the 5 minute breaks. What I mean is that money and awareness is being raised. As of this writing, the Fistula Foundation has raised $330 from a lot of the very generous and kind visitors to this site. It is something that I appreciate and I am sure many of you reading this appreciate too. This is money that wasn’t being raised before. Of course, I would like to hear what people think about the logic behind lengthening the time.
By the way, Larkia brought up the idea of creating a chat channel that I could embed into the site. This would be a more robust chat option right out of the box and would allow you to see who is online and voting in real time.
Marc